The company, and the WVA, prefers the phrase tobacco harm reduction. (Several pages on the BAT site also echo the copy deployed by WVA.) After all, BAT markets cigarette alternatives, such as glo, a device that heats compatible (read: BAT-made) tobacco sticks, instead of combusting cigarettes
He was raised in a comfortable upper-middle-class suburb and had a childhood very different from the childhoods of his own kids
Smoking accounts for 480,000 annual deaths and nearly $300 billion in medical costs and wasted productivity
So, a store like Rite Aid can explicitly state that cigarettes and tobacco products are non-refundable (source), which is a common practice, as long as this policy is clearly communicated
Make sure to subscribe so all future posts find their way to your inbox