Back in May of 2104, I wrote a little post about other cartoons that promoted or warned against- smoking
Why are we allowing to have our freedom of choice taken away from us because of affordability
[5] Shu Wang, David Merriman, and Frank Chaloupka, Relative Tax Rates, Proximity, and Cigarette Tax Noncompliance: Evidence from a National Sample of Littered Cigarette Packs, Public Finance Review 47:2 (March 2019): 276-311
To prevent smokers from infringing on the rights of others, especially when it comes to second-hand smoke, smoking on the streets or most public spaces is not allowed

Who This Is For / Who It Is Not For Who This Is For Households where one family member smokes indoors and others dont want smoke exposure Renters who have moved into a property with thirdhand tobacco smell in the walls and soft furnishings Homeowners preparing a property for sale and needing to remediate tobacco odour Households where a neighbours smoke regularly enters through shared walls, vents, or balconies Anyone who has already tried a budget HEPA unit and found the smell returns within weeks Who It Is Not For Households looking for a general-purpose purifier the VOC-focused units on this list are overkill if bushfire smoke or pollen is the primary concern (see our general air purifier rankings) Anyone expecting an air purifier to completely eliminate embedded thirdhand smoke from unpainted walls purifiers reduce airborne VOC concentration, they do not strip VOCs from painted or porous surfaces Households where someone smokes inside a sealed room with no ventilation no purifier substitutes for ventilation in that scenario Anyone considering an ozone generator as a stronger option ozone is a respiratory hazard per Queensland Health Final Verdict The cigarette smoke air purifier market in Australia is cluttered with units that handle the particle fraction adequately and ignore the chemical fraction entirely
